= Better Privacy check-point 2012-07-05 = == Summary == * Private projects will be developed by the Orange squad. * Still working toward migrating the branches to the new model to go in beta. == Manage sharing == * Still not in full beta. * Main missing thing to go in beta is the migration of branches to the sharing policy model. * Team is landing database patches and model changes to decouple bugs and branches privacy so that we can put the UI in beta only for beta. * At the same time, work on migrating branches is under way. * Thread on launchpad-dev about permissions to create branches clarified the rules. * Might need some rules clarifications around personal branches. * Given bug relationships is not needed by stakeholders, Orange is going to take private projects instead. === ACTIONS === * ACTION: [purple] Settle who can create personal branches with the various information type possibility. * ACTION: [purple] Consolidate feature flags so that it's easy to turn sharing on/off into beta. * ACTION: [purple] Put the sharing UI in beta for bugs. * ACTION: [purple] Remove branch visibility switch and move to the new normal policy access. * ACTION: [purple] Expose the proprietary status type. == Entitlement == * On hold, until branches are migrated to the new model. * Need one flag for maintainer to specify that they have proprietary branches. Could use another for public project, but in the end, simply leave that functionality to private projects. === Actions === * ACTION: [purple] Enable basic entitlement for branches: people should be able to enable branch privacy themselves. == Private projects == * This is in the LEP phase. * Given bug relationships is not needed by stakeholders, Orange is going to take private projects instead. * Curtis thinks that users will keep using the "user data" information type to work around the lack of multiple-tasks for proprietary. * If that's the case, we could change the proprietary information type to have the same properties than user-data. === Actions === * ACTION: [mrevell] Review/revise the LEP * ACTION: [sinzui] Work out how users can take a private project public, while retaining some private artefacts. * ACTION: [mrevell] Stakeholder consultation on private projects and research of existing materials.