## page was renamed from ReviewerMeeting20100120 = ReviewerMeeting20100317 = == summary == * rockstar to set up UI reviewers team in LP == logs == === ameu === {{{ [15:00] #startmeeting [15:00] Meeting started at 10:00. The chair is bac. [15:00] Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE] [15:00] hi and (finally) welcome to the AMEU reviewers meeting [15:00] who is here today? [15:01] me! [15:01] hi salgado [15:01] anyone else around? [15:02] me [15:03] me [15:03] sending out call to foundations... [15:03] sinzui, EdwinGrubbs, abentley, adeuring, BjornT, danilos, mars: ping [15:03] thanks gary_poster [15:03] me [15:03] me [15:03] :) [15:03] me [15:03] me [15:03] me [15:04] me [15:04] gmb: ping [15:04] me [15:04] bac: Sorry, OTP... [15:04] gmb: perhaps you can follow with one eye [15:04] bac: Am now NOTP, so it's okay :( [15:05] :) [15:05] me! [15:05] * gmb is happy to be here, honest [15:05] [topic] agenda [15:05] New Topic: agenda [15:05] * Roll call [15:05] * Agenda [15:05] * Outstanding actions [15:05] * New topics [15:05] * Peanut gallery [15:05] [topic] outstanding actions [15:05] New Topic: outstanding actions [15:06] so let's see if we've made any progress [15:06] [topic] salgado to update the wiki page to encourage reviews with sufficient context. [15:06] New Topic: salgado to update the wiki page to encourage reviews with sufficient context. [15:06] I did it! [15:06] finally [15:06] \o/ [15:06] [topic] leonardr to create an example for automated lplib tests in the launchpad tree. (revisit 17-Mar). [15:06] New Topic: leonardr to create an example for automated lplib tests in the launchpad tree. (revisit 17-Mar). [15:07] i'm about to start work on that [15:07] leonardr you may not even know this was a topic we've been tracking. gary_poster put you down for it [15:07] yes, he and i have been talking about it [15:07] leonardr: cool. when do you think you might have something? [15:07] bac: hopefully by the end of the week [15:07] but it shouldn't take long in any event [15:08] leonardr: great. i'll leave it as an item for next week then [15:08] [topic] bac to seek opinion of IS and Legal wrt community reviewers and committers. (done 5-Mar, no response from legal). [15:08] New Topic: bac to seek opinion of IS and Legal wrt community reviewers and committers. (done 5-Mar, no response from legal). [15:08] ok [15:08] as indicated i sent an email to our two legal folks and elmo a while back. [15:09] i got a response from elmo but not the lawyers. i'll talk to andrew on IRC and see when he will respond. [15:09] at that point i'll share the input and we can revisit the topic from our perspective [15:09] [topic] bac to update wiki re: interim status of community reviewers and committers [15:09] New Topic: bac to update wiki re: interim status of community reviewers and committers [15:09] * bac fail [15:10] [topic] rockstar to update bugs to reflect new naming convention and will update the style guide [15:10] New Topic: rockstar to update bugs to reflect new naming convention and will update the style guide [15:10] i don't think rockstar is here today [15:11] did anyone see the bugs created? [15:12] we'll carry it over until paul is here [15:12] [topic] mars to discuss UI reviewers team on UI call [15:12] New Topic: mars to discuss UI reviewers team on UI call [15:12] bac, he usually attends the other meeting. [15:12] bac, cone [15:12] done [15:12] mars: what was the outcome? [15:12] abentley: yeah, but i invited him to this one today. perhaps he didn't get my email in time. [15:12] bac, rockstar is going to set up the UI reviewers team this week [15:13] [action] rockstar to set up UI reviewers team in LP [15:13] ACTION received: rockstar to set up UI reviewers team in LP [15:13] mars: thanks [15:13] bac, no need for that, we already have an item in the UI call :) [15:13] np [15:13] [topic] peanut gallery [15:13] New Topic: peanut gallery [15:14] any one have an unlisted topic for discussion? [15:14] Me. [15:14] go graham [15:14] I'd like to rotate off on-call reviewing for a cycle, maybe two, and I'm wondering if we have a process for dealing with that. Should I just canvas for someone to take over my Tuesday EU slot? [15:15] gmb: we've had people do it in the past [15:15] gmb: in fact, i think i originally proposed it but then never got around to taking a leave [15:15] Okay. [15:15] In that case, any volunteers for Tuesday EU ? :) [15:16] * bac looks for the schedule page on the wiki [15:16] https://dev.launchpad.net/ReviewerSchedule [15:16] Aha. [15:16] so we have double on M, W, and Th [15:17] * bac would (selfishly) really like to have someone in EU on Tuesday... [15:17] gmb: why don't you look around for the rest of this cycle and see if you can bribe someone [15:18] i have an item [15:18] bac: Okay; however I'm sprinting next week and unavailable the week after, so I'll try to sort something out sooner. [15:18] gmb: ok [15:19] this week the US moved to daylight savings time. the UK does so in two weeks. would we like to move the meeting back to 1400UTC? would that be a hardship for anyone? jtv says it is better for him. [15:20] any one have an opinion or is 1500UTC good? [15:22] 1400UTC works, I think [15:22] No objections here. [15:22] salgado: does it affect you badly? [15:22] nope [15:23] ok, let's move it to 1400UTC starting next week. [15:23] anything else? [15:23] 3... [15:24] 2... [15:24] 1... [15:24] have a great day. thanks for coming. [15:24] #endmeeting [15:24] Meeting finished at 10:24. }}} === asiapac === {{{ }}}