1 [13:01] <Ursinha> #startmeeting
2 [13:01] <Ursinha> Welcome to this week's Launchpad Production Meeting. For the next 45 minutes or so, we'll be coordinating the resolution of specific Launchpad bugs and issues.
3 [13:01] <MootBot> Meeting started at 10:01. The chair is Ursinha.
4 [13:01] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
5 [13:01] <allenap> me
6 [13:02] <Ursinha> [TOPIC] Roll Call
7 [13:02] <Ursinha> Not on the Launchpad Dev team? Welcome! Come "me" with the rest of us!
8 [13:02] <MootBot> New Topic: Roll Call
9 [13:02] --> al-maisan
10 [13:02] <Ursinha> :)
11 [13:02] <allenap> me
12 [13:02] <Ursinha> me
13 [13:02] <al-maisan> me
14 [13:02] <Ursinha> rockstar, Chex, ping
15 [13:02] <danilos> me
16 [13:02] <gary_poster> me but team lead call is winding down
17 [13:02] <Ursinha> gary_poster, ok, so half-me :)
18 [13:02] <gary_poster> :-)
19 [13:03] <Chex> me
20 [13:03] <Ursinha> gary_poster, want to have another person to join in your behalf?
21 [13:03] <Ursinha> sinzui, guess your case is the same as gary_poster's
22 [13:03] <sinzui> me
23 [13:03] <sinzui> I am attending two meetings
24 [13:03] <gary_poster> Ursinha: no, I think I need to multitask :-) thank you though
25 [13:03] <Ursinha> sinzui, you're a ninja
26 [13:03] *** salgado-lunch
27 [13:03] <Ursinha> gary_poster, ok, thanks :)
28 [13:04] <Ursinha> stub and rockstar are missing, they can join later, I suppose
29 [13:04] <Ursinha> [TOPIC] Agenda
30 [13:04] <Ursinha> * Actions from last meeting
31 [13:04] <Ursinha> * Oops report & Critical Bugs & Broken scripts
32 [13:04] <Ursinha> * Operations report (mthaddon/Chex/spm/mbarnett)
33 [13:04] <Ursinha> * DBA report (stub)
34 [13:04] <Ursinha> * Proposed items
35 [13:04] <MootBot> New Topic: Agenda
36 [13:04] <Ursinha> [TOPIC] * Actions from last meeting
37 [13:04] <Ursinha> * Chex to follow up with thumper about the multiple git import failures on the importd
38 [13:04] <Ursinha> * matsubara to talk to bugs team about https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=OOPS-1439EB784 and file a bug on oops-tools to handle LaunchpadTimeoutError correctly
39 [13:04] <Ursinha> * filed bug 495609, haven't talked to bugs team about it yet
40 [13:04] <Ursinha> * matsubara to add +filebug timeout oopses to the bug report
41 [13:04] <Ursinha> * added
42 [13:04] <Ursinha> * matsubara to email stub about the DBA report
43 [13:04] <Ursinha> * emailed
44 [13:04] <MootBot> New Topic: * Actions from last meeting
45 [13:04] <ubottu> https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=1439EB784
46 [13:04] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 495609 in oops-tools "api timeouts should be in the timeouts section" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/495609
47 [13:04] <Ursinha> Chex, what do you say about your item?
48 [13:05] <Ursinha> all the others are ok
49 [13:05] <Chex> So I spoke with Thumper about this, and he is aware of the issue, and has been trying to talk to the bzr team about this.
50 [13:05] <Chex> He suggested that I also file a bug to track this issue, which I am working on doing now.
51 [13:05] <Ursinha> thanks Chex
52 [13:05] --> EdwinGrubbs
53 [13:06] <Ursinha> [action] Chex to file a bug about the multiple git import failures on the importd
54 [13:06] <MootBot> ACTION received: Chex to file a bug about the multiple git import failures on the importd
55 [13:06] <Ursinha> moving on
56 [13:06] <Ursinha> [TOPIC] * Oops report & Critical Bugs & Broken scripts
57 [13:06] <MootBot> New Topic: * Oops report & Critical Bugs & Broken scripts
58 [13:06] <Ursinha> == OOPS report ==
59 [13:06] <Ursinha> sadly the partial oops reports aren't ready yet, because automated generation is disabled and it takes about 4 hours for the lpnet one to complete
60 [13:06] <Ursinha> the script is still running on devpad since I put it to work about 3 hours ago
61 [13:06] <Ursinha> I know this is a performance problem that will be worked on by matsubara when he returns in January
62 [13:06] <Ursinha> danilos, answering your earlier question, I don't think it's possible to have the old oops-tools easily, because it was changed to record oopses in the database instead of merely parsing the oops files (the new oops-tools, called oops-db)
63 [13:06] <Ursinha> BUT I'll talk to matsubara to see if there's something we can do about it, besides fixing the performance/locks problems in this new version (using the older version only to have partial summaries, for instance)
64 [13:06] <ubottu> https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=db
65 [13:07] <Ursinha> thanks ubottu :P
66 [13:07] <Ursinha> in this meantime I'll do some investigation myself
67 [13:07] <Ursinha> also, as soon as I have a list of oopses for lpnet, I'll let you all know - should be in one hour or so (hopefully)
68 [13:07] <Ursinha> and sorry about that
69 [13:08] <Ursinha> == failing scripts ==
70 [13:08] <Ursinha> all scripts that were failing last week haven't failed today (karma-update, allocate-revision-karma and a few others)
71 [13:08] <Ursinha> I'll keep watching for the next days to be sure the problem is fixed
72 [13:08] <Ursinha> == critical bugs ==
73 [13:08] <Ursinha> there's currently one critical bug, bug 495250
74 [13:08] <Ursinha> sinzui, is this really critical? I see it's targeted to 3.1.13 now
75 [13:08] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 495250 in launchpad-registry "there goes the neighbourhood (launchpad is getting owned by spammers)" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/495250
76 [13:08] <sinzui> YES IT IS
77 [13:08] <Ursinha> sinzui, do you have plans to try to include it in a reroll?
78 [13:09] <sinzui> Ursinha: we need to see this on staging and give it a good review, so we decided to pursue this as a CP, not for roll out
79 [13:09] <sinzui> Ursinha: There is a small change for a reroll
80 [13:09] <Ursinha> sinzui, right, thanks for the info
81 [13:09] <danilos> Ursinha, still, we just discussed it during TL call and we feel we should still try to use the old version; it can't be that hard to go through bzr log and come up with an older version
82 [13:09] <sinzui> Ursinha: Chex is putting the branch on staging now
83 [13:09] <Ursinha> danilos, that's what I'll work on to figure out
84 [13:09] <danilos> that was about oops tools, sorry
85 [13:09] <danilos> Ursinha, thanks
86 [13:09] <Ursinha> danilos, I got it :)
87 [13:10] <Ursinha> sinzui, good
88 [13:10] <Ursinha> danilos, are we planning to have a reroll?
89 [13:10] <danilos> Ursinha, no re-roll unless OOPS summaries or we see hordes of people complaining about something on #launchpad
90 [13:11] <Ursinha> [action] Ursinha to try to come up with an older working version of oops-tools (non oops-db version)
91 [13:11] <ubottu> https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=db
92 [13:11] <MootBot> ACTION received: Ursinha to try to come up with an older working version of oops-tools (non oops-db version)
93 [13:11] <ubottu> https://lp-oops.canonical.com/oops.py/?oopsid=db
94 [13:11] <Chex> sinzui: that branch is there now
95 [13:11] <Ursinha> danilos, right, as I expected
96 [13:11] <sinzui> \o/
97 [13:11] <al-maisan> :)
98 [13:11] <Ursinha> ok, thanks everyone
99 [13:11] <Ursinha> [TOPIC] * Operations report (mthaddon/Chex/spm/mbarnett)
100 [13:12] <MootBot> New Topic: * Operations report (mthaddon/Chex/spm/mbarnett)
101 [13:12] * Ursinha waves to Chex
102 [13:12] <Ursinha> I wonder if I'm still connected
103 [13:12] <danilos> Ursinha, you are not
104 [13:13] <Ursinha> danilos, thanks
105 [13:13] <Ursinha> Chex don't want to talk with us :)
106 [13:13] <Chex> sorry folks
107 [13:13] <Chex> LOSA report for this week:
108 [13:13] <Chex> The LP 3.1.12 roll-out was yesterday. The rollout went well overall, but there were some issues that we are continuing to address. Please see the Incident report here: https://wiki.canonical.com/IncidentReports/2009-12-16-Launchpad-Rollout
109 [13:13] <Chex> - LP read-only mode had issues during the rollout last night.
110 [13:13] <Chex> - The LP librarian has been adjusted so that we should be fine for space over the holidays.
111 [13:14] <Chex> - Importd bug on code-branches being left behind:
112 [13:14] <Chex> : https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-code/+bug/497569
113 [13:14] <ubottu> Ubuntu bug 497569 in launchpad-code "code imports are not cleaned up on disk after an import times out" [Undecided,New]
114 [13:14] <Chex> and thats all for us this week.
115 [13:15] <Ursinha> anything for Chex?
116 [13:15] <Ursinha> ok, cool
117 [13:15] <Ursinha> thanks Chex
118 [13:15] <Ursinha> [TOPIC] * DBA report (stub)
119 [13:15] <Ursinha> well, stub isn't here so I'll mail him about the report
120 [13:15] <Ursinha> [action] Ursinha to send one email to stub about the db report
121 [13:15] <MootBot> New Topic: * DBA report (stub)
122 [13:16] <MootBot> ACTION received: Ursinha to send one email to stub about the db report
123 [13:16] <Ursinha> [TOPIC] * Proposed items
124 [13:16] <MootBot> New Topic: * Proposed items
125 [13:16] <Ursinha> none in the page, does anyone have something?
126 [13:16] <Ursinha> I'll take this as a no :)
127 [13:17] <Ursinha> Thank you all for attending this week's Launchpad Production Meeting. See https://dev.launchpad.net/MeetingAgenda for the logs.
128 [13:17] <Ursinha> Happy holidays and see you all next year!
129 [13:17] <Ursinha> #endmeeting
130 [13:17] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 10:17.
131 [13:17] <Ursinha> thanks everyone
132 [13:17] <al-maisan> thanks Ursinha
133 [13:17] <-- al-maisan
134 [13:18] <gary_poster> Ursinha: thank you. (stub is on vacation and will be back Dec 21)
135 [13:18] <Ursinha> oh I have an lpnet summary! weeeee
136 [13:18] <Ursinha> https://devpad.canonical.com/~ursula/lpnet-oops.html
137 [13:18] <Ursinha> danilos, ^
138 [13:19] <danilos> Ursinha, thank you
launchpad development