ReviewerMeeting20090826
summary
- we need to find a way to allow outside contributors to run branches through ec2
- we need to open up lp-dev-utils project
logs
ameu
26-08-2009 10:00:57 > barry: #startmeeting 26-08-2009 10:00:58 < MootBot!n=MootBot@unaffiliated/mootbot: Meeting started at 09:00. The chair is barry. 26-08-2009 10:00:58 < MootBot!n=MootBot@unaffiliated/mootbot: Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE] 26-08-2009 10:01:16 > barry: hello everyone and welcome to this week's ameu launchpad reviewer's meeting. who's here today? 26-08-2009 10:01:18 < bigjools!n=quassel@canonical/launchpad/bigjools: me 26-08-2009 10:01:19 < gmb!n=gmb@seagoon.grahambinns.com: me 26-08-2009 10:01:20 < EdwinGrubbs!n=egrubbs@canonical/launchpad/edwingrubbs: me 26-08-2009 10:01:23 < noodles775!n=miken@canonical/launchpad/noodles775: me 26-08-2009 10:01:31 < bac!n=bac@canonical/launchpad/bac: me 26-08-2009 10:01:31 < deryck!n=deryck@samba/team/deryck: me 26-08-2009 10:01:40 < beuno!n=beuno@canonical/launchpad/beuno: me 26-08-2009 10:01:59 < cprov!n=cprov@canonical/launchpad/cprov: me 26-08-2009 10:02:31 < henninge!n=henning@d052040.adsl.hansenet.de: me 26-08-2009 10:02:32 < jtv!n=jtv@125.25.119.254.adsl.dynamic.totbb.net: me 26-08-2009 10:02:58 > barry: adeuring, leonardr, salgado ping 26-08-2009 10:03:02 < danilos!n=danilo@canonical/launchpad/danilos: me 26-08-2009 10:03:06 > barry: mars and sinzui send their apologies 26-08-2009 10:03:08 < salgado!n=salgado@canonical/launchpad/salgado: me 26-08-2009 10:03:11 < adeuring!n=abel@p4FC54E09.dip.t-dialin.net: whoops, me 26-08-2009 10:03:14 -!- mbarnett!n=mbarnett@cpe-66-25-160-175.austin.res.rr.com has joined #launchpad-meeting 26-08-2009 10:03:39 > barry: allenap: ping 26-08-2009 10:03:42 < leonardr!n=leonardr@canonical/launchpad/leonardr: ping 26-08-2009 10:03:52 > barry: [TOPIC] agenda 26-08-2009 10:03:53 < MootBot!n=MootBot@unaffiliated/mootbot: New Topic: agenda 26-08-2009 10:04:00 > barry: * Roll call 26-08-2009 10:04:00 > barry: * Action items 26-08-2009 10:04:00 > barry: * UI review call update 26-08-2009 10:04:00 > barry: * Peanut gallery (anything not on the agenda) 26-08-2009 10:04:03 > barry: 26-08-2009 10:04:06 > barry: 26-08-2009 10:04:10 > barry: [TOPIC] action items 26-08-2009 10:04:11 < MootBot!n=MootBot@unaffiliated/mootbot: New Topic: action items 26-08-2009 10:04:19 > barry: * beuno to add a 'ui' specialty to ReviewerSchedule 26-08-2009 10:04:28 < beuno!n=beuno@canonical/launchpad/beuno: did not do it :( 26-08-2009 10:04:30 < beuno!n=beuno@canonical/launchpad/beuno: will do today 26-08-2009 10:04:32 < beuno!n=beuno@canonical/launchpad/beuno: PROMISE 26-08-2009 10:04:41 < allenap!n=gavin@89.16.172.38: me 26-08-2009 10:05:00 > barry: beuno: thanks! i was asked at our standup who our mentors and mentats were and i just can't remember ;) 26-08-2009 10:05:13 < beuno!n=beuno@canonical/launchpad/beuno: UI mentor, just me for now 26-08-2009 10:05:18 < beuno!n=beuno@canonical/launchpad/beuno: I will graduate people 26-08-2009 10:05:32 > barry: cool 26-08-2009 10:05:50 > barry: * gary_poster and barry will transfer review guidelines from the old wiki and old old wiki to the new wiki 26-08-2009 10:05:56 > barry: not done 26-08-2009 10:06:05 > barry: i will work on this this week 26-08-2009 10:06:16 > barry: [TOPIC] * UI review call update 26-08-2009 10:06:17 < MootBot!n=MootBot@unaffiliated/mootbot: New Topic: * UI review call update 26-08-2009 10:06:25 > barry: beuno: do you want to give an update? 26-08-2009 10:06:55 < beuno!n=beuno@canonical/launchpad/beuno: so 26-08-2009 10:07:00 < beuno!n=beuno@canonical/launchpad/beuno: we continued to talk about what works and what doesn't 26-08-2009 10:07:12 < beuno!n=beuno@canonical/launchpad/beuno: and I have a lot of notes that I need to update the wiki with 26-08-2009 10:08:40 > barry: beuno: how well do you think reviews are going these days? how is ui 3.0 shaping up? 26-08-2009 10:08:59 < beuno!n=beuno@canonical/launchpad/beuno: I think they are going very well 26-08-2009 10:09:02 -!- intellectronica!n=tom@intellectronica.net has joined #launchpad-meeting 26-08-2009 10:09:15 < beuno!n=beuno@canonical/launchpad/beuno: and that 3.0 is shaping up much better than I expected 26-08-2009 10:09:15 < intellectronica!n=tom@intellectronica.net: me 26-08-2009 10:09:29 < beuno!n=beuno@canonical/launchpad/beuno: developers are very involved in taking decisions 26-08-2009 10:09:46 < beuno!n=beuno@canonical/launchpad/beuno: the navigation changes are in place, which is a big one 26-08-2009 10:10:24 > barry: beuno: do you think we're going to hit our ui 3.0 deadline? 26-08-2009 10:10:46 < beuno!n=beuno@canonical/launchpad/beuno: barry, I don't think well hit 100% of the pages for Sept 26-08-2009 10:10:49 < beuno!n=beuno@canonical/launchpad/beuno: but pretty close 26-08-2009 10:11:35 > barry: cool. beuno anything else, or does anybody have any other questions or issues about ui reviews? 26-08-2009 10:13:42 > barry: okay, moving on... 26-08-2009 10:13:48 > barry: [TOPIC] peanut gallery 26-08-2009 10:13:49 < MootBot!n=MootBot@unaffiliated/mootbot: New Topic: peanut gallery 26-08-2009 10:14:01 > barry: any other topics not on the agenda? 26-08-2009 10:15:04 > barry: 5 26-08-2009 10:15:06 > barry: 4 26-08-2009 10:15:09 > barry: 3 26-08-2009 10:15:12 > barry: 2 26-08-2009 10:15:14 > barry: 1 26-08-2009 10:15:32 > barry: cool. thanks everyone, and thanks for all the great reviewing everyone's doing. 26-08-2009 10:15:34 > barry: #endmeeting
asiapac
26-08-2009 18:54:05 > barry: #startmeeting 26-08-2009 18:54:06 < MootBot!n=MootBot@unaffiliated/mootbot: Meeting started at 17:54. The chair is barry. 26-08-2009 18:54:06 < MootBot!n=MootBot@unaffiliated/mootbot: Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE] 26-08-2009 18:54:27 > barry: jml, thumper, rockstar, mwhudson hi! welcome to this week's asiapac reviewer's meeting. how are you guys doing? 26-08-2009 18:54:31 < thumper!n=quassel@canonical/launchpad/thumper: here 26-08-2009 18:54:40 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: hello 26-08-2009 18:54:41 < rockstar!n=rockstar@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: ni! 26-08-2009 18:54:44 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: hello 26-08-2009 18:54:44 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: I'm well thank you 26-08-2009 18:54:55 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: rockstar, when did you move to asiapac? 26-08-2009 18:55:00 < * mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson is under an email molehill rather than a mountain 26-08-2009 18:55:04 > barry: jml: settling into your new position yet? 26-08-2009 18:55:25 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: barry, "settling", hmm not quite 26-08-2009 18:55:28 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: New position? 26-08-2009 18:55:34 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: barry, I'm more like a pioneer on my long trek west 26-08-2009 18:55:39 > barry: rockstar: joined us here a few weeks ago 26-08-2009 18:55:41 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: barry, to borrow a myth from your country :) 26-08-2009 18:55:45 > barry: :) 26-08-2009 18:56:01 > barry: wgrant: welcome! 26-08-2009 18:56:07 < rockstar!n=rockstar@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: jml, this way, I can get my morning chores done in the morning. 26-08-2009 18:56:23 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: Morning barry. 26-08-2009 18:56:42 > barry: so... not much really to speak of in the ameu meeting 26-08-2009 18:57:17 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: wgrant, the public announcement should come out soon 26-08-2009 18:57:19 > barry: beuno updated the ReviewerSchedule page with the ui mentats 26-08-2009 18:57:59 > barry: beuno is the only full fledged ui reviewer but he is going to do some graduations soon 26-08-2009 18:58:10 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: barry: anything happen in reviewer meeting land in the last 3 weeks? 26-08-2009 18:58:20 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: barry: jml and i haven't been here 26-08-2009 18:58:29 > barry: mwhudson: not much really. we've been having very short meetings in both timezones 26-08-2009 18:58:41 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: barry: hooray 26-08-2009 18:59:13 > barry: so, i'll just open up the floor. what's on y'all's mind today? 26-08-2009 18:59:29 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: "gosh, we get a lot of email" 26-08-2009 19:00:14 > barry: mwhudson: heh 26-08-2009 19:00:30 > * barry laughs when he hears of people complaining about a few hundred messages a day 26-08-2009 19:00:51 < * jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml thinks... 26-08-2009 19:01:11 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: any feedback from non-Canonical contributors about the review process? 26-08-2009 19:01:23 > * barry looks at wgrant 26-08-2009 19:01:33 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: i guess i can take the opportunity to do a little survey 26-08-2009 19:01:42 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: barry: Working well for me. 26-08-2009 19:02:14 > barry: i'll just say again that it is /fantastic/ to see yours and others from the community landing branches 26-08-2009 19:02:28 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: It's great to finally be able to! 26-08-2009 19:03:05 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: as build engineer for the next cycle, what's causing you, the developer, the most pain? 26-08-2009 19:03:07 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: My only slight issue is that sponsors are often unclear on how to do things. 26-08-2009 19:03:10 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: Is this not documented? 26-08-2009 19:03:24 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: mwhudson: 'build engineer'? 26-08-2009 19:03:34 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: wasn't that announcement on launchpad-dev! 26-08-2009 19:03:48 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: No. We don't find anything out. 26-08-2009 19:03:50 > barry: wgrant: can you elaborate? 26-08-2009 19:03:58 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: bah 26-08-2009 19:04:06 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: and the wiki page is internal 26-08-2009 19:04:12 < * jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml frowns 26-08-2009 19:04:14 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: still learning at this sort of thing it seems :) 26-08-2009 19:04:44 > barry: yep. old habits die hard, but we're really trying to move more and more resources, communications, etc. into the public square 26-08-2009 19:04:51 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: barry: Well, some of my sponsors have had trouble working out how to ec2test my branches. I'm not sure why. 26-08-2009 19:05:09 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: What was this email meant to contain? 26-08-2009 19:05:25 > barry: mwhudson: we really should find a way for non-Canonicals to run ec2 26-08-2009 19:05:27 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: we're going to have a build engineer position 26-08-2009 19:05:34 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: barry: +inf 26-08-2009 19:05:35 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: it's a rotating postiition 26-08-2009 19:05:51 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: "Each development cycle, a different engineer will be taken off his normal development duty, and have has main focus for the cycle the development and well being of the build system. " 26-08-2009 19:05:52 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: the build engineer works on making developers lives more pleasant, essentially 26-08-2009 19:06:03 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: Aha. I see. 26-08-2009 19:06:15 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: i'm the first one, starting officially on monday 26-08-2009 19:06:17 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: mwhudson, in answer to your question 26-08-2009 19:06:26 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: i'm probably going to tackle some buildbot annoyances first 26-08-2009 19:06:36 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: jml: you sent me an email about this that i haven't read yet :) 26-08-2009 19:06:46 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: mwhudson: Bonus points for making it public. 26-08-2009 19:06:57 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: wgrant: yeah, that should be possible 26-08-2009 19:07:01 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: mwhudson, my email wasn't so much about my pain points, actually :) 26-08-2009 19:08:00 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: mwhudson, it takes way too long to land branches; buildbot should only send emails that require action; test failures in devel break ec2test runs 26-08-2009 19:08:08 > barry: jml, mwhudson what is the main hold up to allowing the public to run ec2? is it the payment issue? 26-08-2009 19:08:24 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: barry: i imagine so 26-08-2009 19:08:41 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: also ec2test is still private i think, but that will change soon (?) 26-08-2009 19:09:05 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: mwhudson, not a pain point for me, but one I've had to watch: it takes too long to get set up with a dev env 26-08-2009 19:09:46 > barry: surely we can find a way to subsidize the ec2 costs. it's gotta be trivial in the scheme of things. i usually feel guilty expensing it every quarter 26-08-2009 19:09:48 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: mwhudson, the main meta issue is that it's really hard to see what the status of various build-related projects are (e.g. buildbot going public, ec2test going public, etc) 26-08-2009 19:10:17 < rockstar!n=rockstar@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: barry, when we have a UEC set up in the data center, it might be easier. *shrug* 26-08-2009 19:10:27 > barry: rockstar: good point 26-08-2009 19:10:33 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: jml: i think A build engineer, though probably not me, should focus on getting buildbot running the test suite in parallel across several instances 26-08-2009 19:10:45 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: mwhudson, I very strongly agree. 26-08-2009 19:11:13 < rockstar!n=rockstar@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: mwhudson, abentley and I had a discussion about test layers today, and whether or not we're really using the layers properly. 26-08-2009 19:11:45 < rockstar!n=rockstar@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: I find I spend a lot of time setting up and tearing down the test harnesses just to run one test (that usually runs in shorter time than set up or tear down. 26-08-2009 19:11:51 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: rockstar: i would claim that using layers correctly is close to impossible, but maybe that's a bit bigoted 26-08-2009 19:12:07 > barry: rockstar: i can almost bet we're not. the layers are horribly named and it is not intuitive to know what layer a test should go in 26-08-2009 19:12:39 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: rockstar: there's also the terrible way we start daemons in tests, that doesn't help 26-08-2009 19:12:40 < rockstar!n=rockstar@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: barry, yeah, GoogleServiceLayer and LibrarianLayer were two we identified as not really necessary for most of our tests. 26-08-2009 19:12:41 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: switching to testresources would help here 26-08-2009 19:12:47 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: +1 jml 26-08-2009 19:12:50 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: I'm a little terrified about the work involved 26-08-2009 19:12:52 < rockstar!n=rockstar@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: jml, +1 26-08-2009 19:12:55 > barry: rockstar: and they take a long time to start 26-08-2009 19:13:04 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: but maybe if we actually explored what needed to happen, it would be less terrifying 26-08-2009 19:13:08 < rockstar!n=rockstar@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: barry, yeah, which is basically what I spent much of yesterday doing. 26-08-2009 19:13:11 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: librarian takes forever! 26-08-2009 19:13:37 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: wgrant, indeed. 26-08-2009 19:13:37 < rockstar!n=rockstar@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: wgrant, this morning it took 15.391 seconds to start up, and 7.3 seconds to tear down the librarian. 26-08-2009 19:13:48 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: mwhudson, so, that's not really a survey, since it's just me :) 26-08-2009 19:14:13 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: rockstar: It's about twice as fast here, most of the time. 26-08-2009 19:14:25 < rockstar!n=rockstar@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: mwhudson, really, if I had a pony request, it'd be a graph for how long the test suite is taking, and maybe some mini graphs of different sections of the test. 26-08-2009 19:14:27 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: for all that, step 1 is still going to be force build on buildbot 26-08-2009 19:14:34 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: rockstar: that's a good idea 26-08-2009 19:14:58 < * jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml agrees -- it's in an email I sent :) 26-08-2009 19:15:10 < rockstar!n=rockstar@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: jml, dammit. You and your organization... 26-08-2009 19:15:33 -!- mbarnett!n=mbarnett@cpe-66-25-160-175.austin.res.rr.com has quit ["Leaving"] 26-08-2009 19:15:42 < rockstar!n=rockstar@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: Do we have a place to aggregate all of these ideas? 26-08-2009 19:15:47 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: exactly! 26-08-2009 19:16:00 < rockstar!n=rockstar@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: jml, did you send an email about that too? 26-08-2009 19:16:07 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: I was about to say, step 0 should really be tracking this. 26-08-2009 19:16:11 > barry: rockstar: like a wiki? <wink> 26-08-2009 19:16:14 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: rockstar, it was in the same email as the graph stuff :) 26-08-2009 19:16:29 < rockstar!n=rockstar@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: barry, wikis are TERRIBLE issue trackers. 26-08-2009 19:16:30 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: barry, or, umm, a bug tracker. 26-08-2009 19:16:38 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: barry, I've got this good one I can sell you 26-08-2009 19:16:46 < rockstar!n=rockstar@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: I know these really great guys who spend a lot of time writing a bug tracker... 26-08-2009 19:16:49 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: step -1: move BE wiki pages to dev.lp.net 26-08-2009 19:16:53 > barry: :) 26-08-2009 19:17:00 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: mwhudson, \o/ 26-08-2009 19:17:12 < mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson: step 0: a tag in launchpad-project, i guess 26-08-2009 19:17:35 < rockstar!n=rockstar@canonical/launchpad/rockstar: Maybe a product in launchpad-project. 26-08-2009 19:17:38 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: Wouldn't a separate product be much better? 26-08-2009 19:17:53 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: rockstar, wgrant, maaybe 26-08-2009 19:18:10 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: I don't think that the way Launchpad uses products is the way Launchpad wants others to use products though 26-08-2009 19:18:26 < * jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml makes a note about that 26-08-2009 19:18:26 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: No. 26-08-2009 19:18:30 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: But this one is different. 26-08-2009 19:19:10 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: wgrant, yeah, I think so too, but I'm not sure how it's different. 26-08-2009 19:19:27 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: jml: It's not part of the codebase. 26-08-2009 19:19:37 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: wgrant, some of the bugs are in the code base 26-08-2009 19:19:38 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: Most of the other products are. 26-08-2009 19:19:40 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: Hmm. 26-08-2009 19:19:48 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: wgrant, but a subproduct would fit there, I guess 26-08-2009 19:20:11 < * mwhudson!n=mwh@canonical/launchpad/mwhudson writes another thing down, "make sure buildbot config is in a branch or two on launchpad" 26-08-2009 19:20:16 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: the secret, proprietary project with all of our developer utilities might well belong as a public sub-project of Launchpad 26-08-2009 19:20:35 > barry: jml: +1 26-08-2009 19:20:45 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: jml: lp-dev-utils, or is there something else? 26-08-2009 19:20:52 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: wgrant, lp-dev-utils, yes. 26-08-2009 19:21:10 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: wgrant, that is, I can neither confirm nor deny the existence of said project... 26-08-2009 19:21:26 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: Heh. 26-08-2009 19:21:42 < * wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant whines about the product/project/project/projectgroup confusion. 26-08-2009 19:21:50 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: patches accepted :) 26-08-2009 19:22:02 > barry: wgrant: beuno just today told me i could jfdi (rename those things :) 26-08-2009 19:22:14 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: either that, or sabotage barry's bass so he gets some more free time 26-08-2009 19:22:23 > barry: jml: that is so cruel 26-08-2009 19:22:27 < wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant: Heh. 26-08-2009 19:22:46 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: wgrant, all you need to do is add an extra string -- it'll baffle him 26-08-2009 19:22:49 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: barry, <3 26-08-2009 19:23:04 > barry: jml: ouch :) 26-08-2009 19:23:09 > barry: does that mean we're done here? 26-08-2009 19:23:13 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: I think so. 26-08-2009 19:23:34 > barry: wgrant, rockstar, mwhudson anything else? 26-08-2009 19:23:45 < * wgrant!n=wgrant@ubuntu/member/wgrant can think of nothing more to whinge about. 26-08-2009 19:24:12 > barry: 5 26-08-2009 19:24:12 > barry: 4 26-08-2009 19:24:14 > barry: 3 26-08-2009 19:24:15 > barry: 2 26-08-2009 19:24:18 > barry: 1 26-08-2009 19:24:21 < jml!n=jml@canonical/launchpad/jml: Thunderbirds are go! 26-08-2009 19:24:21 > barry: #endmeeting