ReviewerMeeting20100217

Not logged in - Log In / Register

ReviewerMeeting2010mmdd

summary

There were no new topics for discussion so we just reviewed the outstanding issues.

completed

deferred

In the AsiaPac meeting we decided to move the meeting to 21:30Z in order to accommodate Tim's schedule.

logs

ameu

[15:00] <bac> #startmeeting
[15:00] <MootBot> Meeting started at 09:00. The chair is bac.
[15:00] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[15:00] <bac> Hi and welcome to the Launchpad Reviewers Meeting.  Who is here today?
[15:00] <abentley> me
[15:00] <adeuring> me
[15:00] <sinzui> me
[15:01] <deryck> me
[15:01] <henninge> me
[15:02] <bac> gary_poster, bigjools, flacoste, mars, EdwinGrubbs_, gmb, allenap:ping
[15:02] <gmb> me
[15:02] <bigjools> o/
[15:02] <flacoste> me
[15:02] <bac> BjornT_: ping
[15:02] <mars> bac, my apologies, on CHR
[15:03] <bac> mars: ok, thanks
[15:03] <bac> who've i forgotten to harass?
[15:03] <bac> noodles775: ping
[15:03] <henninge> bac: I already pinged danilos ...
[15:03] <danilos> oh, me :)
[15:04] <bac> is jtv around?
[15:04] <henninge> bac: nope, getting an identity
[15:04] <bac> ok, well let's proceed and hope stragglers will arrive in due time.
[15:05] <bac> not much no the agenda today so perhaps it'll be a brief meeting
[15:05] <bac> [topic] agenda
[15:05] <MootBot> New Topic:  agenda
[15:05] <bac>  * Roll call
[15:05] <bac>  * Action items
[15:05] <bac>  * Peanut gallery (anything not on the agenda)
[15:05] <bac> [topic] Action items
[15:05] <MootBot> New Topic:  Action items
[15:06] <bac> [topic] * allenap to start discussion on the ML about doctest size, refactoring, moving corner cases to unittests, etc (done, 10-Feb)
[15:06] <MootBot> New Topic:  * allenap to start discussion on the ML about doctest size, refactoring, moving corner cases to unittests, etc (done, 10-Feb)
[15:06] <bac> allenap: as noted, i see you did follow through.  thanks.
[15:06] <allenap> me
[15:07] <allenap> bac: Yes, though I need to reply to the replies :-/
[15:07] <bac> allenap: ok, thanks.  there was some discussion last week and lots of agreement.
[15:07] <salgado> me
[15:07] <bac> [topic] * gary_poster to do timing tests for try/except, examine current usage of check_permission, and we'll discuss again 17-Feb.
[15:07] <MootBot> New Topic:  * gary_poster to do timing tests for try/except, examine current usage of check_permission, and we'll discuss again 17-Feb.
[15:08] <bac> gary isn't here ATM so let's leave that one on the list and move on.
[15:08] <bac> [topic] * salgado to update the wiki page to encourage reviews with sufficient context.
[15:08] <MootBot> New Topic:  * salgado to update the wiki page to encourage reviews with sufficient context.
[15:08] <salgado> I didn't do it
[15:09] <bac> salgado: ok.  think you can do that for next week?
[15:09] <salgado> sure!
[15:09] <bac> [topic] * bac to update wiki page to make clear community contributor landing responsibilities
[15:09] <MootBot> New Topic:  * bac to update wiki page to make clear community contributor landing responsibilities
[15:09] <gary_poster> try/except: correct, but I'll do it right now.
[15:09]  * bac fail
[15:09] <bac> [topic] * henninge to update guidelines to allow lambda in twisted context
[15:09] <MootBot> New Topic:  * henninge to update guidelines to allow lambda in twisted context
[15:09] <EdwinGrubbs_> me
=== EdwinGrubbs_ is now known as EdwinGrubbs
[15:10] <henninge> Done.
[15:10] <bac> \o/
[15:10] <bac> [topic] * leonardr to create an example for automated lplib tests in the launchpad tree
[15:10] <MootBot> New Topic:  * leonardr to create an example for automated lplib tests in the launchpad tree
[15:10] <bac> gary_poster: did leonardr actually know about this?  i didn't tell him.  did you?
[15:11] <gary_poster> bac: no, it is something in our plans generally
[15:11] <bac> gary_poster: any idea when it'll happen?  if it's just a foundations TODO i'll take it off this list.
[15:11] <gary_poster> bac: is it reasonable to have a "check on this in a month" action item?
[15:11] <gary_poster> Yeah that's fine
[15:12] <bac> [topic] peanut gallery -- items not on the agenda
[15:12] <MootBot> New Topic:  peanut gallery -- items not on the agenda
[15:12] <bac> anyone have something to discuss?
[15:13] <bac> ok, let's adjourn.
[15:14] <bac> thanks for coming.
[15:14] <bac> #endmeeting

asiapac

[21:36] <MootBot> Meeting started at 15:36. The chair is bac.
[21:36] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE]
[21:36] <mwhudson> hello
[21:36] <bac> welcome to the ASIAPAC + Rocky Mountain reviewers meeting
[21:37] <bac> this ought to be pretty quick, unless you all brought topics of conversation
[21:37] <thumper> I didn't
[21:37]  * mwhudson neither
[21:37] <bac> today's AMEU meeting was very straightforward.  we just checked in out past action items and discovered everyone but Gavin was incredibly slack
[21:38] <mwhudson> heh heh
[21:38] <bac> last week allenap started the conversation on the ML about limiting the size of doc tests.  chime in on it if you have thoughts.
[21:38] <thumper> my thoughts revolve around not liking doc tests
[21:38] <bac> those of use who had things to do but failed are:
[21:38] <bac> gary_poster to do timing tests for try/except, examine current usage of check_permission, and we'll discuss again 24-Feb.
[21:38] <bac> salgado to update the wiki page to encourage reviews with sufficient context.
[21:38] <bac> bac to update wiki page to make clear community contributor landing responsibilities
[21:38] <bac> leonardr to create an example for automated lplib tests in the launchpad tree. (revisit 17-Mar).
[21:39] <mwhudson> was that the same thread where BjornT_ talked about actually using doctests as documentation?
[21:39] <mwhudson> because that would be a very good idea
[21:39] <bac> mwhudson: yeah, i believe so.  i must admit i have that thread in my inbox to review in detail
[21:40]  * gary_poster seems to be agreeing, though the sounds are distant
[21:40] <bac> so, rockstar you have anything to discuss?
[21:41] <rockstar> I did, but I can't, for the life of me, remember what it was.
[21:41] <rockstar> So, no.
[21:41] <bac> this meeting is scheduled for 2100UTC but i forgot about it and last week thumper was busy then.  is 2130 better?  matters not one bit to me.
[21:42] <thumper> yes, it is better for me, I have a call with mrjazzcat at 2100
[21:42] <bac> thumper: ok.  anyone opposed to moving it to 2130?  thumper is that too early or is it good to bound your earlier call?
[21:42] <thumper> 2130 is good
[21:43] <thumper> at least until DST ends
[21:43] <bac> ok
[21:43] <bac> i'll update the team calendar...and set an alarm for myself
[21:43] <rockstar> thumper, DST hasn't started yet...  :)
[21:44]  * thumper shakes his head...
[21:44] <bac> otherwise i've got nothing else.  see you next week...
[21:44] <bac> #endmeeting
[21:44] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 15:44.
[21:44]  * thumper resisted the urge to smack rockstar around
[21:44] <mwhudson> thanks bac

ReviewerMeeting20100217 (last edited 2010-02-24 14:00:31 by bac)