ReviewerMeeting2010mmdd
summary
- stuff
- more stuff
logs
ameu
[15:00] <bac> #startmeeting [15:00] <MootBot> Meeting started at 09:00. The chair is bac. [15:00] <MootBot> Commands Available: [TOPIC], [IDEA], [ACTION], [AGREED], [LINK], [VOTE] [15:00] <bac> hi who is here for today's reviewer meeting? [15:00] <jelmer> me [15:00] <mars> me [15:00] <sinzui> me [15:00] <abentley2> me [15:00] <adeuring> me [15:00] <henninge> me [15:00] <henninge> bac: danilo sends his apologies [15:00] <leonardr> me [15:00] <henninge> I think ;) [15:01] <bac> gary, francis, julian are also away [15:01] <mars> Foundations is here. Record time :) [15:01] <BjornT> me (although a bit busy with other things) [15:01] <noodles775> me [15:01] <bac> deryck too. is gmb around today? allenap? [15:01] <gmb> me [15:02] <gmb> bac, allenap is now a Landscaper for 6 moths. [15:02] <adeuring> bac: allenap is on "LP holidays" [15:02] <gmb> Er, months. [15:02] <bac> ah, right [15:02] <mars> gmb, ? Did I miss that in the staffing mail? [15:02] <bac> salgado: ping [15:03] <mars> bac, salgado is off to other projects as well [15:03] <bac> right, right [15:03] <gmb> mars, Possibly; I wasn't paying attention. But he's definitely on rotation to LS. [15:03] <bac> [topic] agenda [15:03] <MootBot> New Topic: agenda [15:03] <bac> * Roll call [15:03] <bac> * Agenda [15:03] <bac> * Outstanding actions [15:03] <bac> * Mentoring update [15:03] <bac> * New topics [15:03] <bac> * ec2 failures - bac [15:03] <bac> * UDS next week. No meeting or volunteer substitute chair? [15:03] <bac> * Peanut gallery [15:03] <bac> [topic] outstanding actions [15:03] <MootBot> New Topic: outstanding actions [15:03] <bac> * bac is a big loser [15:03] <EdwinGrubbs> me [15:04] <bac> i have two items on my plate that i haven't gotten to. i *promise* to do them tomorrow so i can go to UDS with a clear conscience [15:04] <intellectronica> me [15:04] <bac> [topic] rockstar to start ML discussion about the lack of UI reviews [15:04] <MootBot> New Topic: rockstar to start ML discussion about the lack of UI reviews [15:05] <bac> rockstar attends the AMEU meeting so he's not here now. i don't think he did this, though. [15:05] <bac> he brought it up in the meeting last week and had good statistics on the number of UI reviews that have been performed lately and it was very low. [15:05] <bac> i'll remind him to take it to the list and we can chat there [15:05] <noodles775> Yeah, I haven't seen any in a few weeks now (and few before) [15:06] <intellectronica> bac: we've discussed this and we think the stats are wrong [15:06] <bac> intellectronica: really? that's good to hear. [15:07] <mars> intellectronica, bac, true, but that discussion can probably be saved for the list [15:07] <bac> sinzui: what is your impression? have you been doing many? [15:07] <intellectronica> because of ec2 land people don't commit with the quite tag [15:07] <sinzui> I was doing many in week 1 and 2 [15:07] <sinzui> 1 last week [15:07] <gmb> bac, intellectronica and sinzui did 3 or for for me last cycle, for sure. [15:07] <bac> intellectronica: why is that? i thought ec2 land did a good job of getting the ui tag? [15:07] * intellectronica shuts up [15:07] <gmb> s/last/this [15:07] <sinzui> I think this may be indicative that UI should land in weeks 0, 1, and 2 [15:08] <gmb> bac, Only if you tag the review with 'ui' in the mp. [15:08] <gmb> Otherwise I think it just puts all the names in the [r=] block. [15:08] <bac> gmb: ah, so we need to ensure the ui reviewers are tagging correctly or the MP author does it right. [15:08] <gmb> Yes [15:08] <bac> that's good information to pass on. [15:09] <bac> so we have a failure in tools/procedure not lack of reviewing. hurrah. [15:09] <bac> moving on [15:09] <bac> [topic] * ec2 failures - bac [15:09] <MootBot> New Topic: * ec2 failures - bac [15:10] <bac> mars and i chatted this morning and we wanted to hear from people how often they are seeing ec2 jobs just disappear and the effect it is having. [15:10] <bac> personally i see it a lot and it is very disruptive [15:10] <jelmer> bac: I'm often seeing branches disappear, and it's quite annoying. [15:10] <bac> for important branches i've been running them locally [15:10] <mars> So far I know salgado and matsubara have both experienced a few test suite hangs in the past few days [15:10] <bac> also, my ec2 bill last month was 4 times normal [15:11] <gmb> bac, I've seen it happen twice this week already, it's getting annoyingly common. [15:11] <gmb> I don't see many branches hanging; they just vanish. [15:11] <bac> so how can we attack this problem to figure out what is going on? [15:11] <mars> gmb, the instance dies? [15:11] <jelmer> I haven't seen any hanging branches either (or do they get killed automatically?) [15:11] <mars> jelmer, ^ ? [15:11] <salgado> the ec2 instance shuts itself down after 8h [15:12] <gmb> salgado, Ah, so they might well be hangs then. [15:12] <noodles775> I've killed one hanging ec2 land after the log had not been updated for 2hrs. [15:12] <mars> salgado, thanks, that is good to know [15:12] <salgado> if it's left hung for long enough, it will shut down and you won't get any notifications [15:12] <noodles775> (last week) [15:12] <jelmer> mars: yeah, it just disappears silently [15:12] <bac> did we have this problem before jml's subunit changes? [15:12] <mars> jelmer, think it is inside our outside that 8 hour window? [15:13] <jelmer> mars: outside probably [15:13] <mars> ok [15:13] <salgado> bac, I think we had it before. do you know when the subunit changes landed? [15:13] <mars> bac, the changes and fixes landed the 14th of April, your fix landed on the 21st [15:14] <jelmer> I've definitely seen it before his changes as well. [15:14] <bac> jelmer: ok, thanks. [15:14] <mars> jelmer, salgado, that is also good to know. Thanks. [15:15] <mars> For everyone's benefit, I am tracking progress on this with Bug 570380 [15:15] <ubottu> Launchpad bug 570380 in launchpad-foundations "ec2test sometimes hangs on the first windmill test" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/570380 [15:15] <bac> thanks mars [15:15] <mars> I have some solutions being worked on for this, I will keep everyone updated as things progress [15:16] <bac> i guess i'd encourage everyone to not just suffer in silence but (kindly) let mars know when it happens and try to gather some data [15:16] <bac> [topic] * UDS next week. No meeting or volunteer substitute chair? [15:16] <MootBot> New Topic: * UDS next week. No meeting or volunteer substitute chair? [15:16] <bac> i'm at UDS next week and a few others as well. [15:16] <bac> shall we just skip the meeting? [15:16] <bac> or would someone like to volunteer to lead it? [15:17] <bac> i think the group silence is a vote to skip. [15:17] <bac> [action] bac cancels next week's reviewers meeting [15:17] <MootBot> ACTION received: bac cancels next week's reviewers meeting [15:17] <bac> [topic] mentoring update [15:17] <MootBot> New Topic: mentoring update [15:18] <bac> noodles775, jelmer: everything still going well? [15:18] <noodles775> Yep... although more non-soyuz reviews for jelmer would still be great :) [15:18] <jelmer> I reviewed only two branches last week, mostly because I was distracted by other things. It's all going well otherwise though imo. [15:19] <jelmer> and yeah, more non-soyuz branches please :-) [15:19] <bac> [topic] peanut gallery [15:19] <MootBot> New Topic: peanut gallery [15:19] <maxb> I have a peanut item: https://dev.launchpad.net/ReviewingCodeImports claims that community members can be members of ~vcs-imports, however, when it was brought up on the mailing list (subj: Code Import Reviews), the thread fizzled out with me producing a list of places where ~vcs-imports perhaps granted too-wide permissions. Someone should decide whether community members really _can_ be in ~vcs-imports or not, and either change the wi [15:19] <maxb> ki page or work out how to make it happen. [15:19] <bac> hi maxb [15:20] <maxb> I believe this might dovetail with the promised community reviewers email :-) [15:20] <bac> thanks for bringing that up max. [15:20] <bac> maxb: touche [15:20] <wgrant> Promised, legendary, or mythical? [15:20] <wgrant> It seems to be in the realms of legend at the moment :P [15:21] <bac> maxb: i'll bring it up in the ameu meeting this afternoon [15:21] <maxb> thanks [15:21] <sinzui> Looks like poolie and members of the Launchpad-code team can add you gentlemen [15:21] <bac> any other topics? [15:21] <mars> wgrant, it's not mythical, I've seen it! I swear! [15:21] <bac> it's right there in my drafts folder, wgrant. really it is. [15:22] <wgrant> Oh! [15:22] <bac> going once [15:22] <bac> twice [15:22] <bac> thanks for coming everyone. [15:22] <bac> * UDS next week. No meeting or volunteer substitute chair? [15:22] <bac> er, [15:22] <mars> thanks bac [15:22] <bac> #endmeeting [15:22] <MootBot> Meeting finished at 09:22.