launchpad development|
Size: 202
Comment:
|
Size: 2372
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 3: | Line 3: |
| = Go go Banana Slugs! = | https://launchpad.net/~yellow/+mugshots |
| Line 5: | Line 5: |
| == Subscriptions == | Slogan for public consumption: '''''Go go Golden Horde!''''' |
| Line 7: | Line 7: |
| Brad and Benji are working on [[LEP/BetterBugSubscriptionsAndNotifications]], specifics are at [[yellow/Subscriptions]]. | Slogan when we feel tired: '''''Go go [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Banana_slug_closeup.jpg|Yellow Banana Slugs]]!''''' Current project is [[LEP/ParallelTesting]] . == Weekly review call checklist == * Briefly review where we are in project plan. * Any new tricks learned? * Collaboration tricks? * Debugging tricks? * Communication tricks? * Checklists? Processes? * Any nice successes? * Can you attribute your success to anything beyond the innate brilliance of yourself and your coworkers? * Any pain experienced? * Questions to ask: * Are there any cards that are/were taking too long to move? * Are they blocked? * Are we spinning our wheels? * How long is too long? * Are we not delivering value incrementally? * Are we not collaborating? * Did we duplicate any work? * Did we have to redo any work? * Did we misunderstand the technical requirements, the goal, or a process? * Was the ordering of tasks that we chose broken? * Can we learn from it? * Checklist? * Experiment? * Another process change? == Notes for next call == * Gary: lxc docs are here: https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/serverguide/lxc.html * Brad/Benji: hints for dealing with strace blather in diagnosing non-hanging program? == Notes from weekly review call == === Resolutions === * Next "new to us" project (like charms) when we do not know enough to write tests initially, we want to try this process: * Prototype (no tests, as a rule) * Squad discussion: lessons learned, design decisions * Begin coding, TDD. * We will read all ~yellow reviews when in feature development. * We are interested in using Go for our next project, if appropriate. * Short term goal: charm is ready for review next Tuesday, Feb 14. We would like to provide feedback to the juju team about our experience, and we are willing to take time to do so. Gary is reaching out to hazmat and SpamapS to see how it would be best to do this. === Tabled === * How will we share smaller design decisions that we learn during the day? The daily call is good but not good enough. IRC? micro-blogging? |
Yellow Squad Wiki Home
https://launchpad.net/~yellow/+mugshots
Slogan for public consumption: Go go Golden Horde!
Slogan when we feel tired: Go go Yellow Banana Slugs!
Current project is LEP/ParallelTesting .
Weekly review call checklist
- Briefly review where we are in project plan.
- Any new tricks learned?
- Collaboration tricks?
- Debugging tricks?
- Communication tricks?
- Checklists? Processes?
- Any nice successes?
- Can you attribute your success to anything beyond the innate brilliance of yourself and your coworkers?
- Any pain experienced?
- Questions to ask:
- Are there any cards that are/were taking too long to move?
- Are they blocked?
- Are we spinning our wheels?
- How long is too long?
- Are we not delivering value incrementally?
- Are we not collaborating?
- Did we duplicate any work?
- Did we have to redo any work?
- Did we misunderstand the technical requirements, the goal, or a process?
- Was the ordering of tasks that we chose broken?
- Are there any cards that are/were taking too long to move?
- Can we learn from it?
- Checklist?
- Experiment?
- Another process change?
- Questions to ask:
Notes for next call
Gary: lxc docs are here: https://help.ubuntu.com/12.04/serverguide/lxc.html
- Brad/Benji: hints for dealing with strace blather in diagnosing non-hanging program?
Notes from weekly review call
Resolutions
- Next "new to us" project (like charms) when we do not know enough to write tests initially, we want to try this process:
- Prototype (no tests, as a rule)
- Squad discussion: lessons learned, design decisions
- Begin coding, TDD.
- We will read all ~yellow reviews when in feature development.
- We are interested in using Go for our next project, if appropriate.
- Short term goal: charm is ready for review next Tuesday, Feb 14. We would like to provide feedback to the juju team about our experience, and we are willing to take time to do so. Gary is reaching out to hazmat and SpamapS to see how it would be best to do this.
Tabled
- How will we share smaller design decisions that we learn during the day? The daily call is good but not good enough. IRC? micro-blogging?
