Diff for "LEP/BugDependencies"

Not logged in - Log In / Register

Differences between revisions 6 and 7
Revision 6 as of 2011-09-01 15:54:28
Size: 3890
Editor: gmb
Comment:
Revision 7 as of 2011-09-01 16:13:34
Size: 3899
Editor: gmb
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 44: Line 44:
""As an"" upstream project maintainer <<BR>>
""I want"" to be able to mark a bug in my project as being the result of a bug in a dependency
""So that"" I can track the bug in my project separately from the dependency bug.

'''
As an''' upstream project maintainer <<BR>>
'''I want''' to be able to mark a bug in my project as being the result of a bug in a dependency
'''So that''' I can track the bug in my project separately from the dependency bug.
Line 64: Line 65:
=== Launchpad Project Manager / TA (part II)=== === Launchpad Project Manager / TA (part II) ===

Talk to the product strategist soon after cutting a first draft of this document

Bug Relationships

Bug relationships in Launchpad will allow users to record the links between two or more bugs in the system. So, where one bug is blocking another being fixed, that can be shown as a relationship and so on.

Contact: gmb
On Launchpad: Link to a blueprint, milestone or (best) a bug tag search across launchpad-project

Consider clarifying the feature by describing what it is not?

Link this from LEP

Rationale

Why are we doing this now?

What value does this give our users? Which users?

Stakeholders

Who really cares about this feature? When did you last talk to them?

User stories

$STORY_NAME

As a $PERSON
I want $FEATURE
so that $BENEFIT

Ubuntu Developer

As an Ubuntu developer
I want to be able to mark a bug as being blocked by another bug
so that it is obvious in which order bugs need to be tackled

Upstream maintainer

As an upstream project maintainer
I want to be able to mark a bug in my project as being the result of a bug in a dependency So that I can track the bug in my project separately from the dependency bug.

OEM Services

As a Canonical OEM services developer
I want to be able to create a private clone of a public bug (or vice versa)
so that public and OEM-specific discussions can take place about the bug without undue disclosure of confidential information

Launchpad Project Manager / TA

As a Launchpad Project Manager (or TA)
I want to be able to mark bug X as a "meta bug" of bugs A, B and C
so that I can use the bug tracker to track the development of features

Launchpad Project Manager / TA (part II)

As a Launchpad Project Manager (or TA)
I want Launchpad to automatically close a meta-bug once all its child bugs are closed
so that I only have to watch the one bug in order to know that a given feature is complete

Launchpad Developer

As a Launchpad developer
I want to be able to see the dependency/relationship tree for a bug
so that I know where to start with my work to fix the bug.

Have as many as you like. Group user stories together into meaningfully deliverable units. They'll be used as the driving elements of exploratory testing QA.

Constraints and Requirements

Must

  • Provide the ability to say that one bug is related to another in some way.
  • Ensure that relationships between bugs shouldn't (usually) alter the way that either of those bugs behave
  • Provide the ability to mark a bug as a "meta bug" of N other bugs (where N > 1).

  • Provide the ability to create a public "clone" of a private bug, so that OEM-specific bugs that rely on community interactions for fixes can be exposed for outside contributions without the OEM's internal conversations having to be made public.

Nice to have

  • Bug duplication described as a Bug Relationship.

Must not

What MUST it not do?

Out of scope

Subfeatures

Other LaunchpadEnhancementProposals that form a part of this one.

Success

How will we know when we are done?

How will we measure how well we have done?

Thoughts?

Put everything else here. Better out than in.

LEP/BugDependencies (last edited 2011-10-11 10:53:41 by matthew.revell)