launchpad development|
Size: 1284
Comment:
|
Size: 2953
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 4: | Line 4: |
'''Squad started:''' 2011-05-23<<BR>> '''Current week:''' 4<<BR>> '''Next [[PolicyandProcess/FeatureDevelopmentCheckpoint|checkpoint]]:''' 2011-06-15 |
|
| Line 20: | Line 24: |
| * Open questions on [[LEP/BugLinking]] | |
| Line 23: | Line 29: |
| * jml to create a project picker LEP | |
| Line 24: | Line 31: |
| * jml & sinzui to resolve open questions on [[LEP/BugLinking]] | |
| Line 27: | Line 35: |
| || Item || Owner || Expected date || Status || | || '''Item''' || '''Owner''' || '''Expected date''' || '''Status''' || |
| Line 29: | Line 37: |
| || Person pickers || || 2011-06-16 || INPROGRESS || || Project pickers || || || |
|| [[LEP/TrustedPickers#person-pickers|Person pickers]] || || 2011-06-16 || INPROGRESS || || [[LEP/TrustedPickers#project-pickers|Project pickers]] || || 2011-06-16 || INPROGRESS || || [[LEP/BugLinking#user-stories|Bug cloning]] || || || || [[LEP/ManagingDisclosure#seeing-legacy|Seeing legacy disclosure]] || || || || [[LEP/ManagingDisclosure#granting|Granting disclosure]] || || || || [[LEP/ManagingDisclosure#seeing|Seeing disclosure]] || || || || [[LEP/ManagingDisclosure#withdrawing|Withdrawing disclosure]] || || || |
| Line 34: | Line 47: |
| 1. (2 cycles) alpha level, opt-in only private projects 1. Private distributions 1. As a person with rights over a blacklisted name, I want to create a private project or distribution with a blacklisted name without any Launchpad admin intervention or any other privileges, so that I can just get my stuff done and not accidentally destroy everything |
|
| Line 36: | Line 53: |
| * Deliverables * Signed off LEPs * Any user testing sessions * Any RTs * Maybe feature-level deliverables (e.g. 'person pickers') * Where does exploratory testing go? * Where do mockups go? |
* Link to user testing sessions * https://wiki.canonical.com/Launchpad/UserResearch/Disclosure/ * https://wiki.canonical.com/Launchpad/UserResearch/Disclosure/CodySommerville * https://wiki.canonical.com/Launchpad/UserResearch/Disclosure/SteveMagoun * Link to exploratory testing * Link to mockups |
| Line 45: | Line 61: |
=== How are we going to link from deliverables to LEPs? === * Change LEPs to have multiple users stories in a section after the intro and before the constraints * User stories in a LEP can be grouped, can be individual. Either way, must be able to be referenced * A deliverable can correspond to a group of user stories or a single user story * Product team uses the user stories when evaluating progress on feature |
Disclosure
See also disclosure tag
Squad started: 2011-05-23
Current week: 4
Next checkpoint: 2011-06-15
Scope
Out of scope
- Private teams work out of scope, except where necessary to enable above
- Any complicated bug linking beyond the bare case for cloning
Blockers
Open questions on LEP/BugLinking
Special actions
- jml to create a project picker LEP
- jml to go through LEPs, organize along roadmap lines, convert as many requirements to stories as make sense
jml & sinzui to resolve open questions on LEP/BugLinking
Deliverables
Item |
Owner |
Expected date |
Status |
Signed off LEPs |
jml |
|
DONE |
|
2011-06-16 |
INPROGRESS |
|
|
2011-06-16 |
INPROGRESS |
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
Feature documentation |
mrevell |
|
|
Blog post |
mrevell |
|
|
- (2 cycles) alpha level, opt-in only private projects
- Private distributions
- As a person with rights over a blacklisted name, I want to create a private project or distribution with a blacklisted name without any Launchpad admin intervention or any other privileges, so that I can just get my stuff done and not accidentally destroy everything
XXX - missing bits
- Link to user testing sessions
- Link to exploratory testing
- Link to mockups
Somehow fit in two week cycle -- https://wiki.canonical.com/Launchpad/PolicyandProcess/FeatureDevelopment
- Turn into template
How are we going to link from deliverables to LEPs?
- Change LEPs to have multiple users stories in a section after the intro and before the constraints
- User stories in a LEP can be grouped, can be individual. Either way, must be able to be referenced
- A deliverable can correspond to a group of user stories or a single user story
- Product team uses the user stories when evaluating progress on feature
