Disclosure
See also disclosure tag
Squad started: 2011-05-23
Current week: 15
Next checkpoint: 2011-09-21
Scope
Out of scope
- Bug linking will now be a separate project
Deliverables
Item |
Owner |
Expected date |
Status |
Signed off LEPs |
jml |
|
DONE |
sinzui |
2011-09-21 |
DEVELOPMENT |
|
sinzui |
2011-10-13 |
DEVELOPMENT |
|
|
2011-09-21 |
Privacy ribbon LIVE, otherwise DEVELOPMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private teams (LEP to come) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feature documentation |
mrevell |
|
|
Blog post |
mrevell |
|
|
Notes
- We have placed a hard cut-off of 2011-09-21 on picker work: any non-Critical bugs will be picked up by the maintenance squad following feature delivery
- Filtering of picker results has gone well
- Affiliation information will return to pickers soon
- William is working on showing who can see private artefacts associated with a project. As a result, he is also making super fast all queries relating to privacy and Ubuntu.
- Curtis is working on fixing the problem where changing a bug's privacy or security status doesn't yet automatically subscribe/unsubscribe the relevant people.
- We will use UDS to research private teams
- Private teams are now officially in-scope, following a period where they were tacitly in-scope due to the impact our failing team privacy has on other aspects of the Disclosure project.
- Matthew to write a LEP
- Team privacy is relatively easy, except for nesting private teams inside public teams, which will be a little more complicated to handle.
- Curtis expects that tackling private teams will add six weeks to the Managing Disclosure project.
- Jon is rethinking the picker UI following complaints about how many clicks it takes to make a selection.
- Performance woes in both pickers have several delayed the project.
- Three people are now working on picker performance.
- The privacy ribbon is now live and appears to function well
- Stakeholders might not consider this project complete if team privacy is not included
- Private questions expected early October. In prepartion, an admin can remove a question subscriber.
- Decided against allowing hiding of the privacy ribbon.
At each checkpoint, make sure to go over LEP/BetterPrivacy and mark off which requirements have been met
Resources
User research
https://wiki.canonical.com/Launchpad/UserResearch/Disclosure/
https://wiki.canonical.com/Launchpad/UserResearch/Disclosure/CodySommerville
https://wiki.canonical.com/Launchpad/UserResearch/Disclosure/SteveMagoun
- Target picker
- Person picker: invite beta feedback
Exploratory testing
Still needed
Somehow fit in two week cycle -- https://wiki.canonical.com/Launchpad/PolicyandProcess/FeatureDevelopment
- Private teams coverage in LEP
How are we going to link from deliverables to LEPs?
- User stories in a LEP can be grouped, can be individual. Either way, must be able to be referenced
- A deliverable can correspond to a group of user stories or a single user story
- Product team uses the user stories when evaluating progress on feature