Diff for "ReviewerMeetingAgenda"

Not logged in - Log In / Register

Differences between revisions 290 and 291
Revision 290 as of 2010-05-19 15:31:20
Size: 8270
Editor: henninge
Comment:
Revision 291 as of 2010-05-19 15:40:32
Size: 8684
Editor: henninge
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 45: Line 45:
 She would prefer to have a bug attached to each commit but has realized that
 there are commit types that do not reflect a defect and therefore will not have
 a bug. The first objective of QA tags is to make sure that a bug's fix will be
 verified.

 So the rules could be:
   * "If a commit will need QA, it must be linked to a bug."
   * "Orphaned commits are those that should have a bug but don't."

Agenda of the next Launchpad review team meeting

Launchpad review team meetings are held on #launchpad-meeting on irc.freenode.net, and are chaired by BradCrittenden for both the Asia/Pacific (AsiaPac) and Americas/EU (AMEU) time zone meetings. We use MootBot to record the meetings.

The purpose of the meetings is to coordinate Launchpad code reviews, and particularly to ensure that emerging issues with the review process are addressed - such as getting people to take on tough reviews, keeping the latency down, etc.. Blockage in reviews leads to blockage in Launchpad code landings.

The next Launchpad review team meeting will be held at this time:

  • AMEU Wednesday 19-May-2010 1400 UTC - 1445 UTC

  • AsiaPac Wednesday 19-May-2010 2130 UTC - 2200 UTC

You can add new items to the list of proposed items. If they don't make it onto this meeting's agenda, they'll most likely get onto the next meeting's agenda instead.

Agenda

  • Roll call
  • Agenda
  • Outstanding actions
  • Mentoring update
  • New topics
    • ec2 failures update - bac
    • Reviewer move to Friday? - bac
  • Peanut gallery

Apologies

Please include the date for which you will be unavailable.

  • yourname, date

Outstanding Actions

  • bac to define new doctest policy regarding what is "testable documentation".

Notes

Proposed items

  • Ursinha's comments on orphaned commits after last week's meeting. [henninge] She would prefer to have a bug attached to each commit but has realized that there are commit types that do not reflect a defect and therefore will not have a bug. The first objective of QA tags is to make sure that a bug's fix will be verified. So the rules could be:
    • "If a commit will need QA, it must be linked to a bug."
    • "Orphaned commits are those that should have a bug but don't."
  • topic [yourname]

Rejected items

Summaries of previous meetings

ReviewerMeetingAgenda (last edited 2011-01-24 20:30:18 by bac)