launchpad development|
Size: 6626
Comment:
|
Size: 9117
Comment:
|
| Deletions are marked like this. | Additions are marked like this. |
| Line 4: | Line 4: |
| `irc.freenode.net`, and are chaired by BarryWarsaw for both the Asia/Pacific (Asia``Pac) and Americas/EU (AMEU) time zone meetings. We use [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ScribesTeam/MootBot|MootBot]] to record the meetings. | `irc.freenode.net`, and are chaired by BradCrittenden for both the Asia/Pacific (Asia``Pac) and Americas/EU (AMEU) time zone meetings. We use [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ScribesTeam/MootBot|MootBot]] to record the meetings. |
| Line 13: | Line 13: |
| * Asia``Pac '''Tuesday 18-Nov-2008 0300 UTC - 0345 UTC''' * AMEU '''Wednesday 12-Nov-2008 1500 UTC - 1545 UTC''' You can add new items to the list of proposed items. If they don't make it onto this meetings agenda, they'll most likely get onto the next meeting's agenda instead. |
* AMEU '''Wednesday 8-Sep-2010 1400 UTC - 1445 UTC''' * Asia``Pac '''Thursday 2-Sep-2010 0000 UTC - 0030UTC''' You can add new items to the list of proposed items. If they don't make it onto this meeting's agenda, they'll most likely get onto the next meeting's agenda instead. |
| Line 22: | Line 22: |
| * What support can beuno and mrevell offer during the review process? (mrevell) * Email cover letter to ml after pre-imp call? - barry * If there's time, the old boring script * Next meeting * Action items * Queue status * Mentoring update |
* Agenda * Outstanding actions * New topics * Henning Rocks. One-import-per-line now done and in effect. * Mentat update. * gary: benji is checking in our generated WADL and adding tests of the WADL generated for our webservice versions. This is supposed to mean that changing the frozen versions of the webservice in a backwards-incompatible way will be more easily caught by reviewers: don't allow it! It should also mean that running make initially will be noticeably faster. * Some of the UI reviewers have graduated, but ReviewerSchedule indicates that no one has graduated. Same for UI/Reviews, which still lists people who've left the team. * https://dev.launchpad.net/ArchitectureGuide as per the epic - will reviewers please start discussing the values and metrics during reviews? * Peanut gallery |
| Line 34: | Line 36: |
| * your name, date, reason * gmb, 2008-11-12, November Nexus @ Lexington |
* ''yourname, date'' |
| Line 39: | Line 40: |
| * flacoste and foundations to look into techniques for eliminating back-patching of schema types (avoiding circular imports) * rockstar to take discussion of adding launchpadlib tests for exposed api to ml * abentley to investigate current code coverage tools for lp tests |
* lifeless: to set a policy on what can live in lib/lp, lib/services, and lib/coop |
| Line 46: | Line 45: |
| * item, yourname | |
| Line 50: | Line 50: |
| * [[ReviewerMeeting20100804]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100721]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100707]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100630]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100616]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100609]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100602]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100519]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100505]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100428]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100421]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100414]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100407]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100324]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100317]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100303]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100224]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100217]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100210]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100127]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100120]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100113]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20100106]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20091125]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20091014]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20091007]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090930]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090923]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090916]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090909]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090902]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090826]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090819]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090812]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090805]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090729]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090722]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090715]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090708]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090701]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090624]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090617]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090610]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090603]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090513]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090506]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090429]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090422]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090415]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090408]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090318]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090311]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090304]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090225]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090218]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090211]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090204]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090128]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090121]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090114]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20090107]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20081217]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20081210]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20081209]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20081203]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20081126]] * [[ReviewerMeeting20081125]] |
Agenda of the next Launchpad review team meeting
Launchpad review team meetings are held on #launchpad-meeting on irc.freenode.net, and are chaired by BradCrittenden for both the Asia/Pacific (AsiaPac) and Americas/EU (AMEU) time zone meetings. We use MootBot to record the meetings.
The purpose of the meetings is to coordinate Launchpad code reviews, and particularly to ensure that emerging issues with the review process are addressed - such as getting people to take on tough reviews, keeping the latency down, etc.. Blockage in reviews leads to blockage in Launchpad code landings.
The next Launchpad review team meeting will be held at this time:
AMEU Wednesday 8-Sep-2010 1400 UTC - 1445 UTC
AsiaPac Thursday 2-Sep-2010 0000 UTC - 0030UTC
You can add new items to the list of proposed items. If they don't make it onto this meeting's agenda, they'll most likely get onto the next meeting's agenda instead.
Agenda
- Roll call
- Agenda
- Outstanding actions
- New topics
- Henning Rocks. One-import-per-line now done and in effect.
- Mentat update.
- gary: benji is checking in our generated WADL and adding tests of the WADL generated for our webservice versions. This is supposed to mean that changing the frozen versions of the webservice in a backwards-incompatible way will be more easily caught by reviewers: don't allow it! It should also mean that running make initially will be noticeably faster.
Some of the UI reviewers have graduated, but ReviewerSchedule indicates that no one has graduated. Same for UI/Reviews, which still lists people who've left the team.
https://dev.launchpad.net/ArchitectureGuide as per the epic - will reviewers please start discussing the values and metrics during reviews?
- Peanut gallery
Apologies
Please include the date for which you will be unavailable.
yourname, date
Outstanding Actions
- lifeless: to set a policy on what can live in lib/lp, lib/services, and lib/coop
Notes
Proposed items
- item, yourname
Rejected items
