Diff for "ReviewerMeetingAgenda"

Not logged in - Log In / Register

Differences between revisions 16 and 349 (spanning 333 versions)
Revision 16 as of 2008-12-02 02:10:26
Size: 6541
Editor: barry
Comment:
Revision 349 as of 2010-09-08 13:31:44
Size: 9117
Editor: bac
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 4: Line 4:
`irc.freenode.net`, and are chaired by BarryWarsaw for both the Asia/Pacific (Asia``Pac) and Americas/EU (AMEU) time zone meetings. We use [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ScribesTeam/MootBot|MootBot]] to record the meetings. `irc.freenode.net`, and are chaired by BradCrittenden for both the Asia/Pacific (Asia``Pac) and Americas/EU (AMEU) time zone meetings. We use [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ScribesTeam/MootBot|MootBot]] to record the meetings.
Line 13: Line 13:
 * Asia``Pac '''Tuesday 02-Dec-2008 0300 UTC - 0345 UTC'''
 * AMEU '''Wednesday 03-Nov-2008 1500 UTC - 1545
UTC'''

You can add new items to the list of proposed items. If they don't make it onto this meetings agenda, they'll most likely get onto the next meeting's agenda instead.
 * AMEU '''Wednesday 8-Sep-2010 1400 UTC - 1445 UTC'''
* Asia``Pac '''Thursday 9-Sep-2010 0000 UTC - 0030UTC'''

You can add new items to the list of proposed items. If they don't make it onto this meeting's agenda, they'll most likely get onto the next meeting's agenda instead.
Line 22: Line 22:
 * Is OCR still relevant in a world with merge proposals? (barry)
 * Do we need a standard cover letter template for merge proposals? (barry)
 * If there's time, the old boring script
   * Next meeting
   * Action items
   * Mentoring update
   * Queue status
 * Agenda
 * Outstanding actions
 * New topics
  * Henning Rocks. One-import-per-line now done and in effect.
  * Mentat update.
  * gary: benji is checking in our generated WADL and adding tests of the WADL generated for our webservice versions. This is supposed to mean that changing the frozen versions of the webservice in a backwards-incompatible way will be more easily caught by reviewers: don't allow it! It should also mean that running make initially will be noticeably faster.
  * Some of the UI reviewers have graduated, but ReviewerSchedule indicates that no one has graduated. Same for UI/Reviews, which still lists people who've left the team.
  * https://dev.launchpad.net/ArchitectureGuide as per the epic - will reviewers please start discussing the values and metrics during reviews?
 * Peanut gallery
Line 35: Line 36:
 * your name, date, reason   * ''yourname, date''
Line 39: Line 40:
 * barry to look into techniques for eliminating back-patching of schema types (avoiding circular imports)  * lifeless: to set a policy on what can live in lib/lp, lib/services, and lib/coop
Line 44: Line 45:
  * item, yourname
Line 48: Line 50:
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100804]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100721]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100707]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100630]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100616]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100609]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100602]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100519]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100505]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100428]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100421]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100414]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100407]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100324]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100317]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100303]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100224]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100217]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100210]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100127]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100120]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100113]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100106]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20091125]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20091014]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20091007]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090930]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090923]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090916]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090909]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090902]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090826]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090819]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090812]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090805]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090729]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090722]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090715]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090708]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090701]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090624]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090617]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090610]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090603]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090513]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090506]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090429]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090422]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090415]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090408]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090318]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090311]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090304]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090225]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090218]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090211]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090204]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090128]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090121]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090114]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090107]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20081217]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20081210]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20081209]]
Line 49: Line 115:
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20081202]]

Agenda of the next Launchpad review team meeting

Launchpad review team meetings are held on #launchpad-meeting on irc.freenode.net, and are chaired by BradCrittenden for both the Asia/Pacific (AsiaPac) and Americas/EU (AMEU) time zone meetings. We use MootBot to record the meetings.

The purpose of the meetings is to coordinate Launchpad code reviews, and particularly to ensure that emerging issues with the review process are addressed - such as getting people to take on tough reviews, keeping the latency down, etc.. Blockage in reviews leads to blockage in Launchpad code landings.

The next Launchpad review team meeting will be held at this time:

  • AMEU Wednesday 8-Sep-2010 1400 UTC - 1445 UTC

  • AsiaPac Thursday 9-Sep-2010 0000 UTC - 0030UTC

You can add new items to the list of proposed items. If they don't make it onto this meeting's agenda, they'll most likely get onto the next meeting's agenda instead.

Agenda

  • Roll call
  • Agenda
  • Outstanding actions
  • New topics
    • Henning Rocks. One-import-per-line now done and in effect.
    • Mentat update.
    • gary: benji is checking in our generated WADL and adding tests of the WADL generated for our webservice versions. This is supposed to mean that changing the frozen versions of the webservice in a backwards-incompatible way will be more easily caught by reviewers: don't allow it! It should also mean that running make initially will be noticeably faster.
    • Some of the UI reviewers have graduated, but ReviewerSchedule indicates that no one has graduated. Same for UI/Reviews, which still lists people who've left the team.

    • https://dev.launchpad.net/ArchitectureGuide as per the epic - will reviewers please start discussing the values and metrics during reviews?

  • Peanut gallery

Apologies

Please include the date for which you will be unavailable.

  • yourname, date

Outstanding Actions

  • lifeless: to set a policy on what can live in lib/lp, lib/services, and lib/coop

Notes

Proposed items

  • item, yourname

Rejected items

Summaries of previous meetings

ReviewerMeetingAgenda (last edited 2011-01-24 20:30:18 by bac)