Diff for "ReviewerMeetingAgenda"

Not logged in - Log In / Register

Differences between revisions 22 and 336 (spanning 314 versions)
Revision 22 as of 2008-12-08 15:28:34
Size: 6663
Editor: barry
Comment:
Revision 336 as of 2010-08-11 14:27:12
Size: 8861
Editor: bac
Comment:
Deletions are marked like this. Additions are marked like this.
Line 4: Line 4:
`irc.freenode.net`, and are chaired by BarryWarsaw for both the Asia/Pacific (Asia``Pac) and Americas/EU (AMEU) time zone meetings. We use [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ScribesTeam/MootBot|MootBot]] to record the meetings. `irc.freenode.net`, and are chaired by BradCrittenden for both the Asia/Pacific (Asia``Pac) and Americas/EU (AMEU) time zone meetings. We use [[https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ScribesTeam/MootBot|MootBot]] to record the meetings.
Line 13: Line 13:
 * Asia``Pac '''Tuesday 09-Dec-2008 0300 UTC - 0345 UTC'''
 * AMEU '''Wednesday 03-Nov-2008 1500 UTC - 1545
UTC'''

You can add new items to the list of proposed items. If they don't make it onto this meetings agenda, they'll most likely get onto the next meeting's agenda instead.
 * AMEU '''Wednesday 18-Aug-2010 1400 UTC - 1445 UTC'''
* Asia``Pac '''Wednesday 11-Aug-2010 2130 UTC - 2200 UTC'''

You can add new items to the list of proposed items. If they don't make it onto this meeting's agenda, they'll most likely get onto the next meeting's agenda instead.
Line 22: Line 22:
 * Printing strings in doctests (barry)
 * Is OCR still relevant in a world with merge proposals? (barry)
 * Sabbaticals? (barry)
 * Do we need a standard cover letter template for merge proposals? (barry)
   * https://pastebin.canonical.com/11767/
 * If there's time, the old boring script
   * Next meeting
   * Action items
   * Mentoring update
   * Queue status
 * Agenda
 * Outstanding actions
 * New topics
  * Format import lists so they merge well and are clear to review. RobertCollins
  * Call for new reviewers.
  * Removing enums and errors out of interfaces. TimPenhey
  * Policy decisions: Reviewers Meeting or mailing list? RobertCollins
 * Peanut gallery
Line 38: Line 35:
 * your name, date, reason   * ''yourname, date''
Line 42: Line 39:
 * barry to look into techniques for eliminating back-patching of schema types (avoiding circular imports)  * lifeless: to set a policy on what can live in lib/lp, lib/services, and lib/coop
   ** I plan to ignore this, folk seem to have the idea already **
   ** Please reconsider. This item came about because we couldn't figure it out ourselves. Some people won't use 'coop' due to its name. Personally I don't know the difference. --bac **
Line 47: Line 46:

 * Gotchas with new celebrities (Julian)
  * item, yourname
Line 53: Line 51:
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100804]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100721]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100707]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100630]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100616]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100609]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100602]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100519]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100505]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100428]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100421]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100414]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100407]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100324]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100317]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100303]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100224]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100217]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100210]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100127]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100120]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100113]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20100106]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20091125]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20091014]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20091007]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090930]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090923]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090916]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090909]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090902]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090826]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090819]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090812]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090805]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090729]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090722]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090715]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090708]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090701]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090624]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090617]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090610]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090603]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090513]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090506]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090429]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090422]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090415]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090408]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090318]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090311]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090304]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090225]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090218]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090211]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090204]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090128]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090121]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090114]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20090107]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20081217]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20081210]]
 * [[ReviewerMeeting20081209]]

Agenda of the next Launchpad review team meeting

Launchpad review team meetings are held on #launchpad-meeting on irc.freenode.net, and are chaired by BradCrittenden for both the Asia/Pacific (AsiaPac) and Americas/EU (AMEU) time zone meetings. We use MootBot to record the meetings.

The purpose of the meetings is to coordinate Launchpad code reviews, and particularly to ensure that emerging issues with the review process are addressed - such as getting people to take on tough reviews, keeping the latency down, etc.. Blockage in reviews leads to blockage in Launchpad code landings.

The next Launchpad review team meeting will be held at this time:

  • AMEU Wednesday 18-Aug-2010 1400 UTC - 1445 UTC

  • AsiaPac Wednesday 11-Aug-2010 2130 UTC - 2200 UTC

You can add new items to the list of proposed items. If they don't make it onto this meeting's agenda, they'll most likely get onto the next meeting's agenda instead.

Agenda

  • Roll call
  • Agenda
  • Outstanding actions
  • New topics
    • Format import lists so they merge well and are clear to review. RobertCollins

    • Call for new reviewers.
    • Removing enums and errors out of interfaces. TimPenhey

    • Policy decisions: Reviewers Meeting or mailing list? RobertCollins

  • Peanut gallery

Apologies

Please include the date for which you will be unavailable.

  • yourname, date

Outstanding Actions

  • lifeless: to set a policy on what can live in lib/lp, lib/services, and lib/coop
    • * I plan to ignore this, folk seem to have the idea already **
    • * Please reconsider. This item came about because we couldn't figure it out ourselves. Some people won't use 'coop' due to its name. Personally I don't know the difference. --bac **

Notes

Proposed items

  • item, yourname

Rejected items

Summaries of previous meetings

ReviewerMeetingAgenda (last edited 2011-01-24 20:30:18 by bac)